Tuesday, August 22, 2017

11: P.S. to Post 10—The Sussex Beekeeper's Take on the Message to Hans


Don’t take my word on anything I suggest in Post 10; here are some thoughts on the same matter in the actual words of a certain “Sussex Beekeeper” that were transcribed in 1906 into the margins of Lady Luna Holmes Ragnall's 1884 diary, which came into my hands by a most circuitous and convoluted path: 

The Sussex Beekeeper's words:   “Having just
read the interesting new paper by a certain A. Einstein and now Quatermain’s memoir with Hans’ mentioning eclipses brings to mind certain matters that had once piqued my interest concurrent with my interest in the Cornish and Chaldean languages, both preoccupations of which came to a head during the excursion W and I took onto the Cornish moors, but ultimately came to naught as the distractions at that time were piling one onto another. 

"The region where we were staying was one of those Celtic lands that are dotted with stone monuments and rings that had in centuries or millennia past sprung up all over that charming land. I was then just beginning to see a glimmer of purpose in the erections that [possibly] dealt with eclipses, a purpose that stimulated me to venture down avenues of which I’d heretofore paid little attention. In connection with the longitude and latitude of these constructions, I couldn’t help but notice that on or near December 21 and June 21 certain of the stones lined up in thought-provoking ways. This led me later to peruse all manner of almanacs and volumes in the British Library, and certain facts took shape that directly pertained to the stones. 

"For one thing, [various] eclipses of the sun occur roughly every 18 months in some part of our world. Naturally these experiences affect humans of all walks of life, often by exciting some of the more primitive emotions such as fear and awe. This reaction is partly a consequence of a remarkable coincidence. The diameter of the moon happens to be 1/400 of the diameter of the sun. But the moon’s proximity to the earth is 1/400 of the earth’s distance to the sun. The result of this, during a [total] solar eclipse, is that the disc of the moon perfectly covers the disc of the sun—causing any number of atmospheric effects: strange glowings in the resultant darkness, cold, wind, and so on. 

"What must stone-age man have thought of this extraordinary intrusion? Furthermore, I concluded then (an opinion that hasn’t changed) that Stonehenge and its brethren were built and conceived as instruments with the primary purpose of predicting the occurrence of eclipses. The builders of these ancient observatories most certainly made all their calculations under the assumption that both the sun and moon revolved around the earth as even I would have assumed had not W set me straight on the matter! This is only a natural conclusion because, for all major purposes, the sun and moon do appear to behave in just that fashion. 

"Now it happens that one of those obvious facts of life that most people entirely take for granted, never thinking of, is the equivalent sizes of the sun and moon! Nevertheless, this illusion of apparent equivalence of size owes nothing to physical or universal laws; there is no simple definable, materialistic explanation for the relative placements of the sun and moon—no discernible cause. It is merely a coincidence! Yet, it is just this coincidence that causes such an awesome eerie spectacle that stone-age man was inspired to engineer and build their vast calculators.

Photo by John Johnson. Copyright © John Johnson.
"Considering the incalculable import that the equivalent solar-lunar magnitudes have had on our Western culture and civilization, it would be ludicrous to deny that this exceptional coincidence has meaning! One need only to look at the ratio of measurements to become aware of the remarkable relationship that presumably blind chance has provided:

       Sun’s Diameter               :          Moon’s Diameter
Sun’s Distance from Earth        Moon’s Distance from Earth

      865,400 Miles                :                  2,160 Miles 
   92,956,500 Miles                              239,000 Miles

           .0090                          :                     .0090

In other words, a pretty damn peculiar one to one ratio! Hans’ mysterious voice seemed to know what it was talking about? I wonder!”


Formal Notice: All images, quotations, and video/audio clips used in this blog and in its individual posts are used either with permissions from the copyright holders or through exercise of the doctrine of Fair Use as described in U.S. copyright law, or are in the public domain. If any true copyright holder (whether person[s] or organization) wishes an image or quotation or clip to be removed from this blog and/or its individual posts, please send a note with a clear request and explanation to eely84232@mypacks.net and your request will be gladly complied with as quickly as practical.

10: The August 21, 2017 Solar Eclipse & The Sussex Beekeeper at the Dawn of Time

The occurrence of our recent total solar eclipse (the real deal pictured below) with all the attendant excitement reminds me of the theme of The Sussex Beekeeper at the Dawn of Time, Book 3 of MX's "Holmes Behind the Veil" series. The whole point of the book, indeed at the very heart of the book, is an analysis by Sherlock Holmes of the meaning of total solar eclipses. What follows are, first, a few items that support my hypothesis dealing with solar and lunar matters, and, second, a dramatic scenario from the book that is intended to demonstrate Sherlock Holmes' hypothesis along with his reasoning [found in Post 11] that supports his conclusions .

Photo by John Johnson/copyright © 2017 by John Johnson.
Recall that in 1965 Gerald S. Hawkins published his book titled Stonehenge Decoded, and in 1972 renowned cosmologist Sir Fred Hoyle published From Stonehenge to Modern Cosmology.

Hawkins used science, mathematics, and archeology to determine that the stones of Stonehenge are configured in a manner that could allow its designers to determine the occurrence of future solar eclipses. In other words, Hawkins strongly suspected that Stonehenge was built to be an observatory to keep track of the movements of the sun and moon for the principal purpose of knowing—knowing, not predicting—when solar eclipses would occur.

Hoyle used the same disciplines to build on Hawkins’ work by proposing scenarios, from a cosmologist’s view, illustrating why it might have been so important 5 thousand years ago to determine the occurrence of solar eclipses. Aside from the obvious fear factor, he pointed out the existence of nodes (invisible moving points in the sky), the substance and awareness of which the designers of Stonehenge would have positively needed to know and incorporate into their calculations for accuracy's sake when aligning their observatory’s titan stone blocks.

All this is important to the theme of The Sussex Beekeeper at the Dawn of Time because literature’s prototype rugged African explorer Allan Quatermain and Hans, his Hottentot (now termed “Khoisan”) companion since childhood, stumble upon in 1873 a vast secret way-before-its-time interferometer radio telescope that was built in months by Pope Pius IX, scientist James Maxwell, and engineer Impey Barbicane to “listen in” on a dying nova in the constellation of Aquila (see Post No. 12 for more of this plot point's backstory).

Despite all that expertise, time and money, the telescope utterly fails in its purpose. Instead it accidentally tunes into the Cosmic Background Radiation (CBR) left over from the Big Bang some 14 billion years ago. But the sounds of static, hissing, and popping heard through the the telescope's laboratory equipment mean nothing to those great minds of 1873, and the enterprise was deemed an irrevocable failure, resulting in the immediate destruction of the telescope and its infrastructure. [Note that the CBR was rediscovered, also accidentally, in the 1960s by Wilson and Penzias, which earned them the Nobel Prize in Physics.]


 
Until 2016, this was the only known drawing of Hans, by Hookway Cowles for the 1958 Macdonald reprint of The Ivory Child. Apparently, artists utterly ignored the character during his original appearances in six H. Rider Haggard novels from 1912 to 1926.


Yet, from a different perspective, the radio telescope functioned perfectly. It so happens that the static-like sound that was heard over the equipment in the telescope’s laboratory had elements distinctly similar to Hans’ native click language Khoi (which some etymologists conclude is not far removed from the original language spoken by early humans tens of thousands of years ago). Thus it happens that Hans alone hears and understands a message sent from the dawn of the universe some 14 billion years ago and made audible by this titanic “failed” telescope.

Through this fiction and literary device, the novel proposes that all this effort of building the telescope and its failure were intended by the "attentive, deliberate consciousness 'behind the veil'" that I espouse in my five principles (see  Principle 4: Elfin Coincidence) in order to deliver that message to Hans, who would of course be in the right place at the right time, and that the message buried in the CBR, which was vital enough to go to all this trouble, can be summarized as follows:

(1)  Total solar eclipses are, of course, the consequence of the earth's moon and the sun being coincidentally exactly the same relative sizes in our skies, and the probability of such an exact duplication in sizes—given their totally separate and unrelated diameters and distances from the earth—is exceedingly, even awesomely, remote in astronomical terms.*

(2)  And this circumstance of coincident identical relative sizes of the sun and moon is a long-standing fact of terrestrial reality due to that "attentive, deliberate consciousness 'behind the veil'" beginning the task 4-5 billion years ago, deliberately setting things up so that those two orbs would, after a very long while, eventually be seen to march across our skies by our remote ancestors, with the moon incredibly but regularly and perfectly blotting out the sun as a consequence….

(3)  In order to scare early Homo sapiens half to death to the extent that they strove to learn more about these terrifying occurrences through problem-solving….

(4)  Which resulted in the conception of and the building of Stonehenge and similar prehistoric observatories and calculators over much of the world….

(Counter clockwise from top) Stonehenge as it appears today (wikipedia/searchoflife.com) plus two artists' conceptions of how it may have looked 4.5 thousand years ago. (stone-circles.org.uk/ancient-origins.net)  Click on the image to enlarge. 
(5)  Which in turn further resulted in Homo sapiens developing cognitive skills that have held us in good stead ever since.

Naturally, for any of this to “work” as I’ve outlined, an "attentive, deliberate consciousness 'behind the veil'" must be presupposed.

All of the above is meant to share my simple for-me incontestable awareness that while the fabric of the enormous universe with all its stars and galaxies and enormous spaces seems to be materially devoid of consciousness, nonetheless there is something, somehow, somewhere that is able to take the time out of its busy schedule to both prod me to return to school [see blog post 4] and to situate the sun and moon in such a way as to kick start human intellectual and cultural development. I am calling that “something, somehow, somewhere”  an “attentive, deliberate consciousness 'behind the veil'” for want of anything better for the time being.

My novel is complex and convoluted and is intended to stimulate thinking in many arenas, but the concepts enumerated above are always at the foundation of my story, at the root of my privileged discovery of yet another previously unknown and exciting aspect of the Great Detective's life. 

I conclude this article by giving the father of "ratiocination," Edgar Allan Poe, the last word, an observation that touches on all of the above and also the postscript remarks [see below] by the Sussex Beekeeper in equal measure:

"There are few persons, even amongst the calmest thinkers, who have not occasionally been startled into a vague yet thrilling half-credence in the supernatural, by coincidences of so seemingly marvellous a character that, as mere coincidences, the intellect has been unable to receive them." 
—“The Mystery of Marie Rogêt”

[Yet ordinarily, modern inhabitants of this earth never consider this coincidence, always and utterly taking for granted the sun and moon and their movements, which is a foible or quality of modern life that mystery author G.K. Chesterton neatly sums up: "There is in life an element of elfin coincidence which people reckoning on the prosaic may perpetually miss." I think we can accept as a given that the people of Stonehenge and those that preceded that structure by tens of thousands of years were very aware of the movements of the sun, moon, and stars because, at the very least, the firmament constituted their ceiling, but also because their prehistoric situations demanded that they stay attuned to conditions that we are never aware of, never think about, and utterly take for granted.]
The End 
Of this blog post’s essay. 



There is, however, a postscript from the Sussex Beekeeper himself! Just click here or on the text below to read the Beekeeper's views.




Formal Notice: All images, quotations, and video/audio clips used in this blog and in its individual posts are used either with permissions from the copyright holders or through exercise of the doctrine of Fair Use as described in U.S. copyright law, or are in the public domain. If any true copyright holder (whether person[s] or organization) wishes an image or quotation or clip to be removed from this blog and/or its individual posts, please send a note with a clear request and explanation to eely84232@mypacks.net and your request will be gladly complied with as quickly as practical.

Saturday, August 12, 2017

9: The Special Covers of the “Holmes Behind the Veil” Trilogy Series


 
It's time to explain the covers that grace the covers of my three "Holmes Behind the Veil" novels. [Most of the readers of this article will have seen the covers many times by way of various promotions; for those who haven't, please just scroll down to the bottom.] Book covers do not happen by accident. Publishers, authors, artists and designers put a lot of energy into devising the image that is the first portal to liking any book. But first I’ll set the stage.

The Foreword of Book 2 of the "Holmes Behind the Veil" series, The Great Detective at the Crucible of Life, is actually an 1881 document set down by John H. Watson, M.D., wherein he paints a masterful picture of how he first met a fellow just up from Africa named Allan Quatermain . . . .

(left) John H. Watson, M.D.[Sidney Paget] and (right) Allan Quatermain [Charles Kerr]

. . . . and how the two of them crossed the Atlantic to New York on business and quickly, entirely by chance and impulsively, decided they'd travel upstate to the Hudson River Valley to call on Frederick Church, the aging and onetime renowned landscape artist whose paintings Quatermain admired . . . .


“Frederic Edwin Church,” by Charles Loring Elliot, 
1866, oil on canvas (Copyright © Olana 
State Historic Park)

. . . . at his home, which he designed and built, Olana, in upper New York State overlooking the Hudson River . . . .




Late in his life Church built his dream home high on a hill overlooking the Hudson River. Designed to resemble a Persian palace, he called it Olana.
(Copyright © Olana State Historic Park)

. . . . whereupon, Church appreciating his good fortune having two such worldly adventurers unexpectedly come to his door on a cold winter's night, bid them enter and make themselves comfortable in his sitting room before a roaring fire—which room was only used for the most important occasions.


 The sitting room of the Church home. (Photo from the brochure "Treasures from Olana" (Copyright © Olana State Historic Park)

While they sat with goblets of brandy in their hands before the fire, Quatermain notices the oil painting above the fireplace . . . .
El Kasné , the treasury house, was painted specifically to be displayed above the fireplace in the sitting room in Church's home Olana. (Copyright © Olana State Historic Park, 60 in x 50 in.)











. . . . and also another painting that is away in the corner still on an easel . . . .

El Ayn (The Fountain, also known as Constantinople) is currently part of the collection of the Mead Art Museum, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts (24 in. x 36 in.). The fountain is in the bottom right corner. Copyright
© Mead Art Museum


. . . . whereupon the usually taciturn Quatermain turned loquacious and related to Church and Watson the story of a grand adventure in the harsh deserts of east Africa with his man-servant Hans in 1872, and how he, Watson, being of a literary nature, wrote the whole thing down from memory on the voyage back, and finally how he sent that manuscript to Church as a memento of the grand evening they shared in Church’s home Olana, overlooking the Hudson River.

It is that very manuscript written in Watson's hand (a month before he even meets Sherlock Holmes!) that eventually becomes the book titled The Great Detective at the Crucible of Life, Book 2 of the "Holmes Behind the Veil" series.

Now that you have this scenario in your head, you can better understand how the cover (see the Great Detective book cover image at the bottom of this post) of my series came to be.

MX publisher Steven Emecz introduced me to artist/designer Brian Belanger, and Brian asked me what sort of cover I had in mind. I explained (1) that Holmes, while vital to each of the tales, is not the center of attention in two of the books, that he is muted, in the background, part of the reason the series is titled “Holmes Behind the Veil”, and (2) I explained that I am deeply affected by a particular school of art that was never far from my mind as I wrote the books. I went so far as to say that some part of that art was transferred into the novels. And indeed, this school of art became a major plot factor in Book 2, as you've seen summarized just above.

But of course, right about now, some of you are wondering just who this Frederick Church is. Here is a bit of back story (a back story within a back story!):  From 1825 to 1875, there developed a style of uniquely American landscape painting known as the Hudson River School. These works were astonishingly photographic in detail while at the same time rendering nature in such romanticized and noble hues, with such immaculate emphasis on light and atmosphere that the paintings were like windows into paradise. Here is an example titled Mount Corcoran by Albert Bierstadt (© National Gallery of Art).

Mount Corcoran, c. 1876-1877, oil on canvas, 
60 11/16 × 95 7/8 in.

 
But as its sobriquet indicates, many of the original artists painted views of the Hudson River Valley in upper New York State. This was a favorite region of the founder of this new school of art Thomas Cole and of his protégé Frederick Church, and many of Cole's disciples went out of their way to paint the same region.  Among the foremost practitioners of this school, besides Bierstadt, Cole, and Church, were Asher Durand, John Kensett, and Thomas Moran. Church was easily the most popular of these artists because he painted vast—huge—canvases portraying Niagara Falls, towering South American mountain ranges, and erupting Ecuadorian volcanoes that inspired awe in those who viewed them.  The latter two he painted from life having trekked over the Andes Mountains and though Ecuador in 1853.



Niagara, 1857. Oil on canvas, 41-1/2 x 90-1/2 inches. Photograph © Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.


  The Heart of the Andes, 1859. Oil on canvas, 66-1/8 x 119-1/4 inches. Image © The Metropolitan Museum of Art..

Cotopaxi, 1862. Oil on canvas, 48 x 85 inches. Photograph © The Detroit Institute of Arts.

Knowing fully well how his work affected people, he displayed his paintings alone in darkened venues with dramatic lighting much as we would a movie screen in front of an array of seats, and he surrounded the paintings with fragrant flora and/or other props that suited the painting. Of course there was an admission fee and Church became quite well off. 

However, popular interest in this style of painting dwindled, and of course Church not only grew older, his hands became crippled with arthritis so that it became more and more difficult to hold a paint brush. Later in his life Church built his dream home high on a hill overlooking the Hudson River. Designed to resemble a Persian palace, he called it Olana. Since the home, like a jewel, was at the top of a hill, Church designed the approach to the house as a circuitous drive, so that at every bend visitors encountered fabulous scenes of the Hudson River or the Catskill Mountains. Church had planted thousands of trees in such a manner as to purposefully frame choice vistas just as though they were landscape paintings!

Now you might ask how all of this crossed paths with me. Have you ever, out of the blue, seen something that you bonded with fundamentally in an instant? In 1989, in Time magazine or Newsweek, there was a very small reproduction (I forget the point of the article; it was probably a discussion of trends in art at the time) of Hudson River School artist Albert Bierstadt's In the Mountains (Wadsworth Atheneum, Hartford, Connecticut). The actual painting is 36 inches x 50 inches, but the photo in the magazine was hardly larger than a postage stamp, just as seen here (though you might want to click on it). 


Albert Bierstadt's In the Mountains 
(Copyright © Wadsworth Atheneum, 
Hartford, Connecticut)

But, by some magic, by some trick of the moment, this tiny reproduction was enough to forever turn my head, and in short order I was impassioned by all things Hudson River School—in particular Frederic Church.

So you can imagine that as soon as the opportunity presented itself, I visited Olana in upper New York State.


The entrance to Olana
(Photo by Thomas Kent Miller.)
Olana's broad balcony overlooking the 
Hudson River.
(Photo by Thomas Kent Miller.)





Church built his home in a particular orientation relative to his grounds and gardens to literally frame the real-life views of the river and mountains rather as though they were landscape paintings. When he was alive, he maintained those framed views carefully for maximum effect. Even today, the view from the broad balcony pictured above gives an idea of what it must have been like in Church's day. Here I have pieced together two snapshots to clumsily approximate the view from the balcony of the winding Hudson River. (Special photo juxtaposition copyright © by Thomas Kent Miller.)


And that is why I mentioned the Hudson River School of art to Brian. I told him I felt there was something of the “romanticized and noble hues, and immaculate emphasis on light and atmosphere” in my work. And Brian said, "I can do that," and in short order he provided the masterful idyllic landscape that graces the “Holmes Behind the Veil” series. Also note that towards the bottom, the landscape fades into or merges into an image redolent of another aspect common to all three volumes—old, musty books, manuscripts, journals, scrolls, and such like, some mere centuries old, others thousands of years old.

Cover Art and Design by Brian Belanger

You notice that all three of my books have the exact same cover art, which is a joy to me because now, finally, the three connected novels of my trilogy are presented with beautiful matching covers. 

Book 2 of the “Holmes Behind the Veil” series from MX—The Great Detective at The Dawn of Time—will be available September 19. Book 1, Sherlock Holmes on the Roof of the World, is already available, and Book 3, The Sussex Beekeeper at the Dawn of Time, will be available on November 20 from online bookstores and marketplaces everywhere, including Amazon USA, Barnes and Noble, and Amazon UK.

Continued in post 10.
 






Formal Notice: All images, quotations, and video/audio clips used in this blog and in its individual posts are used either with permissions from the copyright holders or through exercise of the doctrine of Fair Use as described in U.S. copyright law, or are in the public domain. If any true copyright holder (whether person[s] or organization) wishes an image or quotation or clip to be removed from this blog and/or its individual posts, please send a note with a clear request and explanation to eely84232@mypacks.net and your request will be gladly complied with as quickly as practical.

Tuesday, August 1, 2017

8: The Special Title Page of The Great Detective at the Crucible of Life


This eighth post no doubt will present far more information than most readers of my Lighthouse Blog will ever care to know. Nonetheless, I feel this explanation is important, as it covers an area once common but now long forgotten, and therefore might easily go right over the heads of many readers.

In posting No 2 , “The Second Principle—The Apparatus”, I called attention to the manner in which Nicholas Meyer and his publisher, E.P. Dutton & Co., chose to present Mr. Meyer's first groundbreaking Sherlock Holmes pastiche in 1974 as "Being a Reprint from the Reminiscences of John H. Watson, M.D. as edited by Nicholas Meyer." This pseudo-attribution was in itself groundbreaking, and the pattern of  “authorship” deflection was quickly adopted by many other pastiche authors, for example, Loren D. Estleman and Frank Thomas.

When writing my first Holmes/Haggard pastiche, I, too, made the decision to present the book as being "From the Journal by Leo Vincey, Esq." in emulation with myself shunted over into the role mere “editor.”

I then decided to take this intentional authorial misdirection to the next level by designing the very first page of CRUCIBLE—i.e., the title page—in a manner that not only tipped my hat to Doyle and Haggard, but also to that whole magical period of 19th Century romance book publishing. I decided to make the title page extra special.

Pick up most any book published during the last 20 years of the Victorian era and first half decade or so of the Edwardian (give or take a few years) and you will notice on the title page a publishing convention that was utterly commonplace  at that time. Centered under the author's name there was invariably (set in very small type) a listing of some of the author's other works. For example, I have in front of me an 1880 printing of Ben-Hur and the title page looks something like this:

BEN-HUR
A TALE OF THE CHRIST
BY
LEW WALLACE
AUTHOR OF "THE FAIR GOD"

Similarly, the 1887 pressing of Jess by Rider Haggard rendered its title page thus:

JESS
BY
H. RIDER HAGGARD
AUTHOR OF
'KING SOLOMON'S MINES'  'SHE, A HISTORY OF ADVENTURE'
ETC.

And, lastly, not to make too fine a point on it, here we have the cover page from an 1891 volume:

THE HAUNTED STATION
AND OTHER STORIES.
BY
HUME NISBET,
AUTHOR OF
"BAIL UP!" "THR DIVERS," "THE BUSHRANGERS'S SWEETHEART,"
"THE JOLLY ROGER," "THE SAVAGE QUEEN," &c., &c.

So when it came time to fashion a title page for CRUCIBLE, nothing at all would do except an emulation of this convention.

BUT there was more! After all, not only was CRUCIBLE "set down" by Dr. Watson, but the nature of what he was recording was far different than any ordinary Sherlock Holmes adventure. It was the "record" of a heretofore untold adventure by the great Allan Quatermain. In fact, it was a tale actually "told" by Quatermain and Watson's role was mainly that of a "stenographer." Thus there was no getting away from the fact that my title page would "one-up" Meyer's and necessarily have two "authors"—Allan Quatermain and John H. Watson, M.D—as well as list myself as "editor." Of course the great fun here is that whereas The Seven-Per-Cent Solution sported one nonexistent fictional author on its formal title page, my book's title page would list two nonexistent fictional authors, plus me in a flagrantly false role. How cool was that? Remember this was 1988, and these concepts were relatively new.

When you added it all up, all the parameters, intentions, tributes, and emulation that needed to be contained on that very first page—the title page—of The Great Detective at the Crucible of Life; or, The Adventure of the Rose of Fire, the illustration shows what the final result was. I was rather proud of myself. I was not aware that anyone else had had the temerity to buck modern publishing conventions to such a degree:

•    A long title
•    A long subtitle
•    Two nonexistent authors, plus a misrepresented “editor”
•    Six lines of supplemental text of a bibliographical nature that was briefly in vogue a whole century and a quarter ago, but by 1910 had largely disappeared.

It should also be noted that for the first 30 years of my writing career, my byline read "Thos." rather than "Thomas". This was to accentuate the "Victorian quality" of all my writing. And during all that time I would explain my reason for doing so as follows:
 
'“Thos.” is an old-fashioned abbreviation of “Thomas,” just as “Wm.” is a shortened version of “William,” “Robt." is short for “Robert” and “Jos.” for “Joseph.” Abbreviating names was common in centuries past due to the relative rarity of paper and the consequent necessity of cramming as many names as possible onto documents such as shipping manifests and parish registers. I chose “Thos. Kent Miller” as my byline since most of my writing has an old-fashioned feel or sensibility because it consists mainly of pastiches of Victorian characters both real and imaginary.'

However, I've frankly grown tired of having to constantly explain myself, and so in 2016 I chose the path of least resistance.


I’ve gone to the trouble of explaining all this in advance of the MX's September 2017 publication of  The Great Detective at the Crucible of Life, because without doubt few if any of my readers would likely notice the title page. I can speak from experience since the book has been around for 15 years. My “cleverness,” as described lovingly above, has not once been noticed, or at least the end product has never once been mentioned to me nor recognized in print—not even by the one-would-hope literate book reviewer for Publishers Weekly, who had absolutely no clue of what I was attempting and dismissed the book outright. That was the day I was knocked off of my cloud back into reality!

But I was not nearly done; rather than capitulating, I dug my heels in deeper, entrenched still further, with the result eleven years later being Book 3, The Sussex Beekeeper at the Dawn of Time.

Book 2 of the “Holmes Behind the Veil” series from MX—The Great Detective at The Dawn of Time—will be available September 19. Book 1, Sherlock Holmes on the Roof of the World, is already available, and Book 3, The Sussex Beekeeper at the Dawn of Time, will be available on November 20 from online bookstores and marketplaces everywhere, including Amazon USA, Barnes and Noble, and Amazon UK.

Post # 9 will briefly discuss world-renowned landscape painter Frederick Church and the Hudson River School of 19th century landscape painting as invoked in Book 2.

Formal Notice: All images, quotations, and video/audio clips used in this blog and in its individual posts are used either with permissions from the copyright holders or through exercise of the doctrine of Fair Use as described in U.S. copyright law, or are in the public domain. If any true copyright holder (whether person[s] or organization) wishes an image or quotation or clip to be removed from this blog and/or its individual posts, please send a note with a clear request and explanation to eely84232@mypacks.net and your request will be gladly complied with as quickly as practical.